Skip to content

Short title of the decision

Proposed

Describe the context and the problem that motivates this decision. What forces are in play, and what question are we answering? Link to the repo files that ground the decision.

Describe what the current state cannot do, or what defect this decision exists to remove.

  1. The most important force or constraint.
  2. The second most important force.
  1. A supporting consideration.
  2. Another supporting consideration.

Description: One paragraph describing the option.

  • Advantages: What this option does well.
  • Disadvantages: Where this option falls short.
  • Risk Assessment: technical low; schedule low; ecosystem low.

Description: One paragraph describing the option.

  • Advantages: What this option does well.
  • Disadvantages: Where this option falls short.
  • Risk Assessment: technical medium; schedule low; ecosystem medium.

State the chosen option in one sentence, then describe how it is realized, citing the real files that implement it.

  1. A good outcome of this decision.
  1. A cost or downside of this decision.
  1. A trade-off that is neither clearly good nor bad.

Summarize what the decision achieves and how the negatives are mitigated.

  • Link each related ADR by its NNNN-kebab.md filename (one bullet per related decision).
  • Date: YYYY-MM-DD
  • Source: path/to/grounding-file

Status: Pending

FindingFilesAssessment
What was checkedpath/to/filecompliant / pending

Summary: One-line summary of the audit result.

Action Required: None